<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>.simplicity &#187; WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotsimplicity.net/tag/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotsimplicity.net</link>
	<description>Simple, reliable, simplicity. A software discussion blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>WordPress, AdSense, other stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/wordpress-adsense-other-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/wordpress-adsense-other-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coilgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuperSecretProject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotsimplicity.net/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, here we are. Using WordPress and everything and yeah I’m fully behind it now. Just keep in mind that it’s (probably) not promoting simplicity in code. Besides that, everything is neat. Michael installed a sourcecode highlighter which you can view in this post. I like it. 
Now about Google AdSense, it&#8217;s something new we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NL">So, here we are. Using WordPress and everything and yeah I’m fully behind it now. <em>Just keep in mind that it’s (probably) not promoting simplicity in code.</em> Besides that, everything is neat. Michael installed a sourcecode highlighter which you can view in <a href="http://www.dotsimplicity.net/?p=22" target="_self">this post</a>. I like it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NL">Now about Google AdSense, it&#8217;s something new we both want and to be very honest I did click on some AdSense links before (when browsing for my coilgun&#8217;s capacitor) so hey, they could be useful and make us a bit of profit while we&#8217;re add it. All the &#8220;profit&#8221; will be used for keeping this site up anyway, not that it&#8217;s <strong>that </strong>expensive, but it isn&#8217;t a free neither.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NL">Besides that, Michael&#8217;s got his week &#8216;o tests this week, so there won&#8217;t be a lot of work made on our secret project, though that&#8217;s mostly my job now anyways since I must admit I&#8217;ve been slacking of a bit. That doesn&#8217;t mean I didn&#8217;t do anything, just not anything useful, hahaha. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We&#8217;ll keep you posted!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="NL"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/wordpress-adsense-other-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vote no! Or don&#8217;t vote really, don&#8217;t care.</title>
		<link>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/vote-no-or-dont-vote-really-dont-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/vote-no-or-dont-vote-really-dont-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotsimplicity.net/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick's thoughts on WordPress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that&#8217;s right. I don&#8217;t care. Oooooh sidebar, how neat. It has links to recent comments. Okay that&#8217;s a neat feature. WYSIWYG editor is for pussies though, hehe. Nah okay, that&#8217;s also convenient, fine. I don&#8217;t like it because it doens&#8217;t represent us. It isn&#8217;t .simplicity code. It&#8217;s 6MB worth of tons and tons of nice features that we don&#8217;t need and never will need. I don&#8217;t believe this admin panel, polls, a user system and some functions, the so called &#8220;Widgets&#8221;, need 6MB of PHP code. With that said, it shouldn&#8217;t be on .SIMPLICITY. It&#8217;s in the name you see, we promote simple software, and WordPress is just not simple.</p>
<p>Does that mean it&#8217;s not neat&#8230; No. It has XML-RPC, which is without a doubt really cool. Amongst that, the admin panel isn&#8217;t bad, it has a lot of nice functions, etc. etc.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t think it belongs within the &#8220;Simple&#8221; software. So if we use it, please be advised. WordPress code is <strong>NOT</strong> simple. It <strong>is</strong> very user friendly and neat.</p>
<p>Now, one last thing: fatal logic error on previous post: Michael thinks we can&#8217;t deside about what engine to use, which is probably correct, but then he (and only he) decides the users can vote for it. Well I&#8217;ll just be an ass and say I won&#8217;t let the users choose, so we can&#8217;t decide on that either. Done.</p>
<p>But fine whatever, we&#8217;ll stick with the 6MB gigantic monsterosity called WordPress for putting TEXT on a webpage. And the &#8220;Add New Category&#8221; is convienent. And we&#8217;ll be busy with other stuff anyway. Like visiting girlfriends. And punishing unwilling colleagues for not working on the all important coilgun project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/vote-no-or-dont-vote-really-dont-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/wordpress-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/wordpress-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotsimplicity.net/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have noticed that .simplicity has changed a bit. The reason for this change is the fact that we&#8217;ve switched to WordPress. Or rather, I switched .simplicity to WordPress. I was getting increasingly tired of SimpleLog. It felt outdated and missed several handy features. With WordPress we now have a drafting system, WYSIWYG posting, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have noticed that .simplicity has changed a bit. The reason for this change is the fact that we&#8217;ve switched to WordPress. Or rather, I switched .simplicity to WordPress. I was getting increasingly tired of SimpleLog. It felt outdated and missed several handy features. With WordPress we now have a drafting system, WYSIWYG posting, a user system, nested comments, polls and a modular sidebar. In my opinion these features benefit the readers of .simplicity. Besides that WordPress makes maintaining the site a lot easier. With WordPress it&#8217;s also extremely easy to add new features as many things have already been created by the open-source community. If we would be using SimpleLog we would have to create all these things from scratch. This is something I simply don&#8217;t want to spend my time on; I rather work on my posts and projects.</p>
<p lang="en-US">Unfortunately, Nick doesn&#8217;t really like WordPress. While I prefer WordPress, he prefers SimpleLog. He told me that SimpleLog&#8217;s admin panel was a lot better than WordPress. And the few features he did like he wanted to write for SimpleLog. Interesting he didn&#8217;t like WordPress widgets. That while he asked for modularity when we started .simplicity.</p>
<p lang="en-US">But it looks like we won&#8217;t be able to make a decision on the blogging engine together. So I&#8217;ll leave the decision up to the readers of .simplicity.</p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8211; Michael</p>
<p lang="en-US">&#8212;</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dotsimplicity.net/2009/01/wordpress-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

